World Food Day: GoalKeepers Report and Food
Security in Nigeria
My dear readers; permit me to digress from
continuation of my last week article on recognition of 21st Century
Inventors to discuss on “World Food Day celebration, Gate Keepers Report and their
implications to Food Security in Nigeria”. This topic is apt at the moment to
remind my fellow citizens of the impending food insecurity threat to our dear
nation, Nigeria.
Tuesday, 16th October 2018 was a World Food
day globally celebrated on annual basis in many countries to remind nations on
the devastating effects of hunger, poverty and squalor. Nigeria joined other
nations to mark the day at the National Agricultural Show Complex, Km 28, Abuja
– Keffi Express way, Nasarawa State. National Agricultural Foundation of
Nigeria (NAFN), a forerunner NGO has annually been organizing the event in
Nigeria in collaboration with Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Development (FMARD).
World Food Day (WFD) provides opportunity for
each country to assemble its stakeholders for conferences, symposia, and
exhibitions as well as examines the different strategies adopted to reduce
hunger and poverty. WFD is globally celebrated every year on 16 October in
honor of the date of the founding of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
of the United Nations, which was formally established in 1945. The day is
celebrated widely by many other organizations concerned with food security, including
the World Food Program and the International Fund for Agricultural Development.
FAO’s Member Countries at the
Organization’s 20th General Conference established WFD in November 1979. The
Hungarian Delegation, led by the former Hungarian Minister of Agriculture and
Food Dr. Pál Romány, played an active role at the 20th Session of the FAO
Conference and suggested the idea of celebrating the WFD worldwide. It has
since been observed every year in more than 150 countries, raising awareness on
the critical issues behind poverty and hunger. The occasion is also used to
showcase innovations and inventions made by researchers, technicians and craftsmen
on the improvement of agricultural productivity.
Two years after the first WFD, the event
was assigned a “theme” in 1981 and since then, “theme” was annually assigned to
each WFD. The theme highlights
common areas of concerns needing attention and action of policy makers,
investors and the general public, Examples, the theme of WFD of 2017 was
“Change the future of migration. Invest in food security and rural development”
while that of 2016 was “Climate change: Climate is changing, Food and
agriculture must too”. The theme of World Food Day 2015 was “Social Protection
and Agriculture: Breaking the Cycle of Rural Poverty” and so on. This year’s (2018)
theme was “Our Actions are our Future. A Zero Hunger by the year 2030 is
possible” This is a smart way of sensitizing the World to work towards
eradicating hunger. The key words of 2018 theme “achievement of zero hunger”
gingered every stakeholder at the venue of the celebration on that day. According
to FAO, “Zero hunger means working together to ensure everyone, everywhere, has
access to the safe, healthy and nutritious food they need. To achieve it, we
must adopt a more sustainable lifestyle, work with others, share our knowledge
and be willing to help change the world – for the better”. FAO further reminded
the audience, “After a period of decline, world hunger is on the rise again”. According
to the latest FAO 2018 State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World
report, “Today, over 820 million people are suffering chronic undernourishment,
Conflict, extreme weather events linked to climate change, economic slowdown
and rapidly increasing overweight and obesity levels are reversing progress
made in the fight against hunger and malnutrition”. Now is the time to get back
on track. The world can achieve Zero Hunger if we join forces across nations,
continents, sectors and professions. Today, 70 percent of the world's poor live
in rural areas where people’s lives depend wholly on agriculture, fisheries or
forestry. “That’s why Zero hunger calls for a transformation of rural economy”
as stated by FAO.
In
Nigeria, the 2018 World Food Day was celebrated with chain of events involving
the stakeholders. The events included a 5 km road-walk; a symposium on Zero
Hunger; a book/photo exhibition, National Agricultural Show and Public
presentation of 2018 Agricultural Performance Survey (APS) Report. The
symposium was done on October 12, which was titled the same as the 2018 WFD
theme: “Our Actions are Our Future: A Zero Hunger World by 2030 is Possible”. The
Minister of State for Agriculture and Rural Development, Senator Heineken
Lokpobiri was the special guest of honor at the event. He reaffirmed the
federal government commitment to achieve Zero Hunger within the next few years.
The Nation, a national newspaper quoted
the Minister “In the next 12 years, Nigeria will join the league of nations who
would be able to feed the world” – and make zero hunger. While we must join the
Minister to drum up the music of hopes as we move into the future, we may
however, pause and ask how herculean the task to end hunger in Nigeria? What is
the performance of agriculture in the current 2018 wet season? The last
question is answered by the Agricultural Performance Report (APS), which was
presented to the public as part of 2018 World Food Day celebration in Nigeria. The
Minister of FMARD, Chief Audu Ogbeh who was represented by the Permanent
Secretary, Dr. Abdulkadir Muazu, officially performed the public presentation
of the APS.
APS
is one of the national mandates of National Agricultural Extension and Research
Liaison Services (NAERLS). NAERLS) is under the auspices of two organizations -
FMARD and Ahmadu Bello University Zaria (ABU). In NAERLS and two other ABU based
National Agricultural Research Institutes; IAR and NAPRI, there is a symbiotic
relationship between FMARD and ABU, which brings out the best out of NAERLS.
Thus, one hand, NAERLS personnel have the opportunity to interface with both
undergraduate and postgraduate students of ABU in teaching and research
activities. On the hand, the same personnel are involved in agricultural
extension activities thereby interfacing with field staff of the 37 ADPs across
the nation. Consequently, there is no conflict of interests between the two
supervisory bodies of NAERLS as they are both achieving their goals. While
FMARD is achieving agricultural extension policy and direction through NAERLS,
ABU uses both the human resources and infrastructure of NAERLS for teaching, learning
and community services. NAERLS being extension service provider has distinctive
position among the National Agricultural Research Institutes in the country.
Thus, NAERLS carries out numerous annual activities with APS one of them. The objectives of the 2018 APS are crops
performance assessment during wet season; crops production forecasts;
identification of constraints to increased agricultural productivity and effective
extension delivery service. Another objective of APS is to provide feedbacks on
field situation and farmers’ problems needing research, and attention of policy
makers for improved research and policy performance. The methodology of the APS
involved the use of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) technique. This includes
questionnaire/checklists administration, farm visits/observations, interviews
with farmers and Ministry/ADP officials /reports of technology review meetings.
A total of Twenty multi-disciplinary teams of three scientists each
constituting 60 scientists conducted the survey across the 36 States, Federal
establishments and Federal Capital Territory. In each state, two communities
were selected from two LGAs in two selected agricultural zones for field
evaluation. From each community, five farmers were interviewed in addition to
focused group discussions held at every site. In all, interactions were held
with over 1,000 individual farmers and 74 different farmers groups. Data capture from the farmers was done
electronically using Android Tablets. Extensive discussions
were also held with the ADP staff, ministry officials and staff of other
relevant agencies. Final wrap-up sessions to validate the data generated and
findings were held at the end of the exercise with officials of the State ADP
and Ministry of Agriculture. The 2018 APS also captured information on
Agricultural Project Interventions at the level of the Local Government Areas
through states’ ministries of Local Government across the nation. Major
findings of the 2018 APS will be discussed next week.
No comments:
Post a Comment