Friday, 8 April 2016

National Teachers Institute: Strengthening Mathematics and Science Education for Solid Technology Foundation in Nigeria



National Teachers Institute: Strengthening Mathematics and Science Education for Solid Technology Foundation in Nigeria
The famous Scientist of the late 1500s, Galileo Galilei was reported as saying “the universe cannot be read until we have learned the language and become familiar with characters in which it is written. It is written in mathematical language and the letters are triangles, circles and other geometric figures…” Since then, mathematics has become essential in many fields of human endeavor. It is the queen of sciences, the pillar upon which technology is built. Thus, the knowledge of mathematics and science subjects is necessary for understanding the basic principles of technology. Generally, technology is referred as the knowledge of how to combine resources to produce desired products, to solve problems, fulfill needs or satisfy wants through technical methods, skills, processes, tools and raw materials. Therefore, all the developed nations became what they are as a result of their technological advancement. Consequently, the technological development of a nation has a direct bearing with the progress of the citizens in acquiring basic knowledge of mathematics and science subjects. It is therefore necessary for Nigeria to have the young ones being effectively groomed in these important subjects at lower level. To do this, a strategy must be made for developing the capacity of the teachers of this lower level.



The saying “You cannot give what you don’t have” is more aptly applicable to teaching profession – you can’t teach what you don’t know. So, Teacher is the foundation of knowledge and when he/she is fully trained and equipped with necessary tools, he/she can impart knowledge to the students who may later become another set of teachers. Continuous capacity building of teachers permits the practitioners of this noble profession to withstand the challenges of twenty-first century and it is one of the reasons why National Teachers Institute (NTI) Kaduna was established. The National Teachers' Institute, Kaduna was established in 1976 primarily because of the pressing need in the country for trained, qualified teaching staff at all levels of the educational system. The Institute's enabling Law charged it among others with the responsibility of "providing courses of instruction leading to the development, upgrading and certification of teachers as specified in the relevant syllabus using Distance Education Techniques. The mission of NTI is to upgrade teachers’ knowledge and skills in curriculum implementation, while instilling in them the virtues of dedication, loyalty, commitment, discipline and resourcefulness. Similarly, the vision of the Institute is to enhance the professional skills of serving teachers for high quality education delivery at primary and secondary levels with a view to uplifting the standard of the educational system in the country.
In the last four decades, NTI has vigorously pursue its mission, made tremendous achievements with tangible records to show and expanded to squarely face other challenges – like poor performance of primary and secondary schools students in mathematics and science subjects.  In the early 2000s, many public schools recorded poor performance with more than 50 % failures in Mathematics and many science subjects at ordinary levels of NECO and WAEC. Indeed, this appalling performance became a national embarrassment especially when the slogan of “2020-20” became the target for Nigeria to be among the top 20 economically developed nations.   Addressing this problem became a national concern; solutions were sought at various fora by stakeholders and NTI devised a means of quickly attending to the problem through creation of a special project; code named “Strengthening Mathematics and Science Education (SMASE)”
Although, SMASE project is not new in Africa, Kenya was the first country to implement such project with both financial and technical supports of Japanese government. The project started in Kenya in 1998 after the signing of bilateral agreement between Kenyan and Japanese governments. The project was initiated due to the poor students’ performance in Mathematics and Science subjects and the need to strengthen the teaching and learning of Science and Mathematics by providing in-service education and training to teachers of the subjects. Nigeria through NTI was able to secure similar supports from Japanese government for SMASE project. The successes recorded made the project to spread to 12 additional African countries. The countries are Uganda, Rwanda, Ethiopia, Malawi, Ghana, Senegal, Niger, Burkina Faso, Zambia, Mozambique, Southern Sudan and Botswana.
Thus, NTI started the SMASE project in 2006 with three pilot states of Kaduna, Plateau and Niger, respectively. An outstanding result was recorded in these three pilot states that led to the up scaling of the project to cover 32 states between the year 2010 and 2013.
What is the modus operandi of SMASE project? SMASE project involves intensive capacity building of education administrators, teachers and supervisors at different levels with modern tools and experience sharing. The teacher must acquire good knowledge before he/she passes it on to the students. Thus, SMASE through Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) provides customized international training opportunities related to the selected subjects in Japan, Malaysia and Kenya. The categories of personnel for these international trainings are SMASE administrators from State Universal Basic  Education Boards (SUBEBs), Federal Ministry Education, Universal Basic Education Commission , Teachers Registration Council of Nigeria, National Education Research Development Centre, NTI and National Mathematics Centre. These opportunities were also extended to the National, State trainers and core teachers from NTI and SUBEBs.
At the national level, NTI on annual basis provides National SMASE customized intensive trainings to 416 primary Mathematics and Science teachers (State trainers) from SUBEBs of 32 states and FCT. Similarly, at the state level, under the supervision of NTI, State SUBEBs provides SMASE trainings to carefully selected 200 primary core teachers from their respective states (Core teachers) 6600 across the 32 states and FCT. The trainings continue to trickle down to the local government area, Zonal and Cluster levels where SUBEBs, using the 200 core teachers, provides cluster SMASE trainings to remaining teachers that did not benefit from the SMASE trainings. The trainings do not end at the cluster level, they are extended to the school level to cover majority of the teachers of mathematics and science subjects and thus, SMASE primary school provides SMASE trainings to the rest of the teachers that have not benefited from the SMASE cluster trainings. These trainings are annually reviewed, redesigned and repeated to all the personnel at different levels while recording the impacts and new challenges in respect of the target – better performance in mathematics and science subjects, 
What are the training contents with a magic wand for performance enhancement in the subject areas?  SMASE training is divided into three cycles of trainings. Each cycle is conducted within a year. The first classification called cycle 1. The training contents of this cycle deal with enhancing positive attitude of teachers and pupils towards the teaching and learning of Mathematics and Science subjects. Sensitization, practical demonstrations, film shows and experience sharing form part of this training cycle. The second classification deals with enhancing classroom activities for effective teaching and learning of Mathematics and Science subjects. The third classification deals the actualization of combined ASEI and PDSI approaches in the teaching and learning of Mathematics and Science subjects. ASEI approach means to actively involve students (pupils) through experiments and demonstrations, improvising by utilising locally available materials in the classroom. PDSI stand for Plan, Do, See and Improve cycle of teachers’ actively. These approaches are practically demonstrated by highly skillful trainers for better understanding of the trainees who should use the knowledge in their classrooms. For efficient use of resources, SMASE trainings are organized in a cascading order from National to state level, local level and school level.

So far, the SMASE project has recorded a number of breakthroughs since its inception in 2006 (phase 1). Some of the recent recorded feats from January, 2010 includes:

(1)        Establishment of a cascading system in which 13 trainees each from 35 states including FCT train 200 core teachers of mathematics and science subjects every year in cycles 1, 2 & 3 in the month of August during long vacation, phase 2.
(2)       Introduction of PDSI (Plan, Do, See & Improve) as an approach that is widely adopted in the country as a medium for disseminating ASEI (Activity, Students-centred, Experimentation & Improvisation) principles.
(3)       Utilization of International trainings sponsored by JICA by sending trainers to countries like Japan, Kenya for capacity building in learner-centred approach from 2010 to date.
(4)       Encourage most states in establishing state In-service Training centre across the country (2011).
(5)       Mobilization of funds through SUBEBs to conduct the training at various levels (National, State and Local) (2013).
(6)       Ability to sustain the programme even after the exit of Japan Government through JICA in February, 2014.
(7)       Being able to develop new training materials and modules as well as improvisation of skills to continue with new cycles 4 and 5 for further capacity development of the trainees. This feat was achieved in this year, 2016.
(8)       Commissioning of E-learning centre, Basic Science Laboratory and ICT Laboratory in the SMASE complex so as to upgrade the centre to a regional In-service Training .(INSET) centre. This was done in January, 2016.
The impacts of SMASE project are clearly exhibited in the improved performance of secondary schools graduates across the country in recent years. Nowadays, it is common to find a public school with record of more than 50 percent of her candidates obtaining five credits and above in NECO and WAEC. Although, the reason for this improved performance may be combination of many factors but there is no doubt that SMASE project has significantly contributed to the outstanding performance. In conclusion, NTI has demonstrated her capability to sustain SMASE project after expiration of the support of Japanese government that ended in 2014.  In Nigeria, most of the developmental projects with foreign financial supports cease to exit when the financial supports are exhausted. Instead, NTI has not only sustained the project but expanded it to higher level. This is quite commendable but other stakeholders must rally round to share costs and responsibilities in order to sustain this laudable project. All hands must be on deck to build the solid foundation for the technological development in Nigeria



 

Low Cost Greenhouse Technology for Vegetable Production in Nigeria



Low Cost Greenhouse Technology for Vegetable Production in Nigeria
A greenhouse is a structure with walls and roof made chiefly of transparent material, such as glass or plastic materials in which plants requiring regulated climatic conditions are grown. These structures range in size from small sheds to industrial-sized buildings. The interior of a greenhouse exposed to sunlight becomes significantly warmer than the external ambient temperature, protecting its contents in cold weather. The technique of using greenhouse to make crop production under regulated environmental condition is generally called greenhouse technology. Many commercial glass greenhouses have production facilities for vegetables or flowers. The transparent greenhouses are filled with equipment including screening installations, heating, cooling, lighting, and may be controlled by a computer to optimize conditions for plant growth. Greenhouse are heated up because of the incoming solar radiation which warms plants and soil inside the building faster as there is no heat transfer by convection.  The air warmed by the heat from hot interior surfaces is retained in the building by the roof and wall.
Conventionally, greenhouses are equipped with screening installations, heating, cooling, and lighting and may automatically be controlled by a computer system.  The transparent materials used for a greenhouse act as a barrier to air flow and is used for trapping energy, warming the air near the ground and preventing it from rising and flowing away.  Glasshouses are used for growing some crops throughout the year such as lettuce and other vegetables.  Crops are protected against adverse climatic conditions such as wind, cold, dust storms and blizzards, precipitation, excessive radiation, extreme temperatures, insects and diseases.  Light and temperature control allows glasshouses to turn in arable land into cultible land and can be useful for crops production where such crops cannot survive the environmental condition especially in the harsh deserts.  The closed environment of a glasshouse has its own unique requirements, compared with outdoor production, pests and disease infestations and extremes of heat and humidity, are also controlled. Glasshouses are often used for growing vegetables, fruits and flowers. Also, glasshouse production require relatively small amount of area compared with field-grown produce and, the return on investment can be good if the requisite markets can be found. Glasshouse-grown vegetables cannot compete with comparable field-grown crops based on price; therefore, Glasshouse-grown vegetables often are marketed to buyers based on superior quality and off- season availability.
Greenhouse offers golden opportunity to farmers for crops growing  anytime  of the year and make the most use of land. The  greenhouse technology provides plants exactly what they need – a perfect climate, a right amount of sunlight, nutrition, exact amounts of water, carbon dioxide for photosynthesis,  proper ventilation and hostility to pests and diseases. The other benefits are that crops of good quality and higher yield can be grown, water requirement is lower compared to crops grown in open space, while the low labour-intensive method helps in controlling pests and diseases. Farmers can achieve 8 - 10 times yield of crops as compared to the open crop cultivation.
Greenhouse technology, if properly explore, has the potential of at least reducing the deficit in the country’s demand significantly. For instance, a 2013 report from the Central Bank of Nigeria indicated that about N16 billion was spent annually on the importation of tomato paste into the country. The report further revealed that the demand for tomato in Nigeria was estimated at 2.3 million metric tons per annum, while the output was 1.8 million metric tons out of which about 50 percent  was being lost due to lack of good storage facilities and poor developed marketing channels. This implies that 900,000 metric tons was the actual output per annum and that about 1.4 million metric tons is required annually to cover the deficit in the demand. Nigeria is the 13th larger consumer of tomatoes in the world and Nigeria should grow tomatoes to meet the demand of the citizens. This is possible with greenhouse technology, Nigeria can stop importation of tomato especially now that the Dangote tomato processing plant is about taking up at Gafan Tomato market in Kano state.
In Nigeria, the use of greenhouses has been confined to research institutes and tertiary institutions where they are often used for on-going research. Private ownership of greenhouses is not too popular until recent years when Dizengoff West Africa Nigeria, a member of the United Kingdom Balton CP Group and few of the organizations have introduced greenhouse farming system into the Nigerian market. Although, past and present crops of Nigerian leadership  have repeatedly restated  Government commitment to the food security programmes. They have not been able to harness greenhouse farming as one of the many options that have been used elsewhere which could possibly be introduced in the Nigerian environment. As such, greenhouse farming is grossly underutilized/popularized and there is need for government to invest more in this agricultural sector. This will certainly make Nigeria a self sufficient nation in the area of food production especially in areas like Vom in Plateau State. Plateau has been identified as a place where many exotic plants such as Passion fruit, Irish potatoes, Cabbage, Roses, other ornamentals, Turnip and Strawberries can be grown because of the temperate nature of the Jos - plateau climate. However, greenhouse technology can be adopted in every part of Nigeria both in urban and rural areas, which will certainly make the country one of the leading nation in terms of food production.
Greenhouse technology is handy for increase productivity and poverty alleviation but not accessible to many Nigerians because of prohibitive cost. This prohibitive cost of construction and maintenance of the convectional greenhouse is one of the major reasons why many people became aloof to the technology. This is because majority of Nigerian farmers are peasant farmers cannot venture into the business of greenhouse farming without support from government in form of grants and/or subsidy. For instance, the cost of materials and installation of a conventional greenhouse of 24 by 8 square meters, which can contain 480 stands of tomato cost between N1.4 to 1.8 million. Obviously, this astronomical cost makes it discouraging to most Nigerians thereby making the technology unpopular. This teething problem associated with conventional greenhouse made Researchers in National Agricultural Extension Research and Liaison Services (NAERLS), one of the research centres of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria to source for locally made materials to construct the greenhouse.   The feat was achieved and a greenhouse was constructed. Although, not all the materials were locally available but the significant percentage of the materials were locally sourced.  The cost implications of the locally made greenhouse is half the price of the conventional/imported materials of the standard greenhouse. The locally made greenhouse is 30 by 12 m2, which can contain 1,056 stands of tomatoes.  The essential materials required for the locally made greenhouse are polyethylene 200 micron 10 meters by 42 meters at average cost of N330,000, insect netting at average cost of N485 per square kilometer, planting bags, trays, organic fertilizer and a set of drip irrigation kits with filter for 16 by 30 m2 greenhouse at average cost of N78,000. The most expensive components of the greenhouse are the polyethylene and drip irrigation kits.  the polyethylene is the transparent material use for covering the greenhouse structure. This material can withstand both mechanical and thermal stresses caused by sunlight and other harsh weather conditions. For now, there is no apparent alternative to this important material. However, alternative is being sought for drip irrigation kits. Already, various perforated sizes of PVC pipes are being tested to serve as lateral line for the drip irrigation system.
Greenhouse technology for vegetable production has bright prospect as a tool for increase food security and income generation to many farmers. This is because vegetables are being produced in all parts of Nigeria. Example in North west and North east; Onion, Tomato and Pepper Tomato, Onion, Pepper Okra, Egg-plant, Amaranthus, Roselle, Pumpkin, Water-melon Carrot, Lettuce are Cabbage being produced.  in North Central;  Pepper, Onion, Tomato, Okra, Amaranthus, Egusi- Melon, Cucumber, Water- Melon, Garlic are Ginger can be produced using the greenhouse technology. In South West, Vegetable crops being produced are  Tomato, Pepper, Okra,  Melon, Amaranthus, Celosia, Corchorus and Egg- plant while in the South East, the crops are Egusi-melon, Okra Amaranthus, Gnetum, Water leaf, Vernonia,  Egg- Plant and Pepper.
In conclusion, the development of low cost greenhouse technology has offered opportunity to the majority of the Nigerian  farming population to enhance their productivity for food security and income generation. Fortunately, NAERLS is ready to partner with relevant agencies to train farmers on the acquisition and management of greenhouse technology. Governments at local, state and federal levels should extend their support to this improved method of crop production. This is way Nigeria may be on path to progress and prosperity.



.  


  



Thursday, 31 March 2016

Readers' Comments on TSA



Readers' Comments
This column considers reactions of the readers to previous articles important. Such reactions are generally feedbacks to the issues raised in the articles and it is another way of allowing readers to make contributions to the column. This week, I am publishing some of the comments sent by readers of this column for your reading pleasure. My dear readers, you can access my previous articles from my blog; www.breakthroughwithmkothman.blogspot.com
Technological Feats of Agricultural Engineers in Nigeria
Dear M. K. Othman,
Thanks for your interesting articles, I am particularly interested in the articles on agricultural mechanization especially the feats achieved by Agricultural Engineers in Nigeria. The desire for our nation to transform these prototypes machines for the benefits of farmers cannot be overemphasized. However, the question is; how ready is the Federal Ministry of Agriculture to create employment among the youths using various technological innovations? For us, as a nation to achieve agricultural revolution, I wish to suggest the followings:
1.     For the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Development to function effectively and respond to the demand of the nation, the Hon Minister must reform the ministry to have the following departments: Finance and Investment, Production, Marketing & Research, Corporate Communication/Farmers Information Service, as well as Legal/Land Administration. Anything short of re-positioning the ministry along this line will clearly mean that PMB’s administration is not ready to make farming a business.
2.    PMB-led administration must define who a modern farmer is vis-a-viz, the desire of government to provide employment via agricultural sector. In determining who the farmer is; government can then determine the level of Mechanization that could be adopted to accommodate the youths.
3.    Another factor that must be taken into account is access to land. Government has to put in place a simple way to acquire land for agricultural purposes. Virgin lands have to be cleared and feeder roads constructed for easy access to cleared farm lands
4.    The government must make decision between full Mechanization and current Fertilizer agricultural policy. Shamefully, it was in the twilight of 2013, when United Nations hinted that Africa will suffer hunger and starvation, unless, they embark on full Mechanization, the then ministry  of agriculture, under Dr. Akinwumi Adesina embraced mechanization albeit, in an unwilling manner. It was clear the previous government had no intention of going into mechanized agriculture then but for UN’s intervention.
5.    Above all, Ministry has to resolve the cold war between Agronomists and Agric Engineers. This raging cold war has greatly retarded the growth of agriculture in Nigeria generally. Experts in the sector believe that agronomists have hidden fear that if Agric Engineers are allowed to play their natural role in the ministry, they, the Agronomists, would be relegated to the background. As a result of this fear factor, efforts at full mechanization of agriculture in Nigeria, has always been frustrated by the Agronomists and Agric Economists in the ministry. Further, Agric experts find it difficult to understand what the authorities in the ministry of agriculture mean by DRY FARMING, if it is not a deliberate effort on their part to shield Irrigation Engineers from having a say in the ministry. The fear of agronomists here is, once you call it irrigation farming, it then mean that Irrigation Engineer must be in-charge, this, they don’t want at the expense of the advancement of agriculture in Nigeria.
6.    In the area of granting loan to farmers, government must ensure that only the genius farmers get access to the loan. A situation where Agric loans are given to those entrepreneurs engaged in food processing, should not be encouraged by Chief Audu Ogbeh led Agriculture ministry. For instance, anybody involved in the business of Rice mill cannot in strict term, be called a farmer, because he is involved in food processing. Not agriculture.  He is at best, an entrepreneur. Core agricultural process terminates at a point the farm produce are ready for sale, this is called Farm Gate. After the farm produce are sold, the next category of people involved are either said to be into food or industrial processing, not farmers in the real sense of it.

Now that Chief Audu Ogbeh has spoken forcefully on full mechanization of Agric to provide employment for the teeming unemployed youths in Nigeria; what is urgently needed is a comprehensive blueprint towards this laudable agenda. Speaking in Ilorin, Kwara State on Wednesday, January 13, 2016, on the flag off of the second phase of Agricultural Equipment Hiring Enterprise [AEHE], Ogbeh identified the problem of agriculture in Nigeria as well as government’s planned response to the problem. To his diagnosis, experts in the sector are totally in agreement with it.  However, in formulating the required blueprint, the minister needs not to look far; he only needs to pick-up a book called: Memo To The President, The Challenge of Agricultural Development in Nigeria by Dr. Clement Kanshio Kaase. I hope this contribution will help to assist Nigeria achieve food sufficiency and poverty alleviation, amen
Emeka Oraetoka is, oramekllis@lycos.com

Treasury Single Account: Buhari's Bold Step and the Journey So Far
Dear M. K. Othman
Your article on TSA is an eye opener to what was taking place in MDAs in Nigeria. It is obvious that the primary benefit of a Treasury Single Account is the mechanism it provides for proper monitoring of government receipts and expenditure. In the Nigerian case, it will help to block most if not all the leakages that have been the bane of the growth of the economy. We have a situation where some Ministries, Departments and Agencies manage their finances like independent empire and remit limited revenue to government treasuries. Under a properly run Treasury Single Account, this is not possible as agencies of government are meant to spend in line with duly approved budget provisions. The maintenance of a single account for government will enable the Ministry of Finance monitor fund flow as no agency of government is allowed to maintain any operational bank account outside the oversight of the ministry of finance. As a matter of fact, deposit money banks stand to lose immensely from the implementation of Treasury Single Account.  This is because of the fact that public sector funds constitute a large chunk of commercial banks deposit.  Indeed, it is estimated that commercial banks hold large amount in trillion public sector funds.  The impact of this amount of money leaving the system can be imagined when one considers the fact that each time the monthly federal allocation is released, the banking system is usually awashed with liquidity and as soon as this public sector funds dries up through withdrawal by the states, liquidity tightens again with interbank rates going up.  Of major impact will be the movement of funds of revenue generating parastatals such as the NNPC, out of commercial banks. The implication of the policy Treasury Single Account, Banks will continue to device means of mobilizing funds from the private sector.  We see a return of the era when women are employed by banks specifically for deposit mobilization and tacitly encouraged to use any means necessary to get funds.  We see increase in deposit interest rates as a major means of inducing customers and most importantly we see a drop in lending and in the profitability of banks, at least, in the short to medium term until they fully come to terms with the impact of the policy and begin to properly position themselves for true banking business.  Ultimately, we see the share price of these banks falling as investors attempt to price in the policy impact. However, the implementation of this programme is a critical step towards curbing corruption in public finance. This is a tool to combat corrupt practices, eliminate indiscipline in public finance and ensure adequate fund flow that will be channeled to critical sectors of the economy to catalyze development. With TSA at the corner, Nigerians must learn to make budget and work with budget. Bravo M. K. Othman for this well enlighten information on TSA.
Dr. Muhammad M. Usman, muttaka@yahoo.com

Dear M. K. Othman
This is an excellent information gathering on TSA. More grease to your elbow for taking your time to educate public on TSA.
Mr. Nuhu Ishaya, ishayanuhu2006@yahoo.com