It is another time for the
readers of this column to give feedbacks, comments and reacts on the previous
articles published in this column. This week there are two major reactions on
the article concerning hydroponics
"soilless cropping system" for the production of fodders to
substitute and convert the Transhumant pastoralism into intensive/range livestock
(cattle) production. Can this address the perennial conflicts of Fulani -
Farmers in Nigeria? Can Fulani - people with the largest stocks of cattle abandon
transhumant pastoralism and adopt the range system? Dr.
Junaidu A. Maina, a season technocrat, a former Director of the Federal
Department of Livestock in the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Development, Abuja presented the burdens of the Fulani,
perception/misperception of other Nigerians on these people and suggestions on
the best way to address the conflicts and improve livestock production. The
second message was received from Mr. Samuel Mbugua, Kenya who mentioned how Kenyan
Government is addressing cattle herders - farmers conflicts. Finally, reminder to my esteem readers that they can access my
previous article from my blog;
www.breakthroughwithmkothman.blogspot.com Happy reading.
Hydroponics
- Soilless Cropping System, a Panacea to Perennial Nomadic - Fulani
and Crops Farmers Conflicts in Nigeria?
Dear M. K. Othman
I note with interest your
contributions to the conversation on pastoralism in Nigeria, which
unfortunately is skewed against pastoralists today. Pastoralists are in difficult times today. They are subject of
innuendos and aspersions, accused of robbery, cattle rustling, rape, kidnapping
and even scorched earth policy. To compliment these accusations our national
dailies often carry a picture of a non-Nigerian (perhaps South Sudanese)
herdsman with an AK47.This has lately created a media frenzy resulting in calls
and agitations for legislation to ban cattle movements (aka pastoralism). This
idea which can lead to our cattle industry self-destruct is regrettably gaining
grounds. Perhaps a better
understanding of this least understood production system may help in having an
informed national conversation.
Pastoralism is the main production system in
Sub-Saharan Africa (SHA) where pastoralists live in arid and semi arid zones.
The system has proved over time to be a very successful strategy in coping with
uncertainties due to climate change, epizootics, build up of parasites and
other related challenges. Ranching, an –intensive enclosed pastoral production
system that obtains in the Americas, Australia and African countries like
Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe has unfortunately not proved successful in SHA.
The failures of World Bank loans on ranching to many SHA countries including
Nigeria can attest to that. These amongst other explains why ECOWAS Heads of
State endorsed transhumance pastoralism in 1998 (ECOWAS Decision A/DEC.5/10/98)
How has pastoralism faired in Nigeria? How does the system makes meat available to Nigerians? Nigerians have come to take meat availability
in their local markets for granted without having to bother on the production
challenges and sacrifice of the primary producers. Although beef is on import
prohibition and the challenges in the North Eastern zone of Nigeria which, has
the largest livestock population, neither shortage nor dramatic increase in
price of beef has occurred. Thanks to transhumance pastoralism with its low
production costs, today a kilo of meat costs between
1000-1200 Naira in the country.Another significant contribution of pastoralists is to
the rural economy in terms of supporting their households and in supplying meat
and milk to rural dwellers at even cheaper prices. Add to all these, employment
opportunities it creates in the downstream sectors of transportation,
abattoirs, suya spots, farm power
etc.
How are our pastoralists
able to meet our meat demand with this level of efficiency without Government
subsidy unlike the crop farmers? In
crop farming, human beings only directly utilize only about a quarter of the
total biomass. The other three quarters is in the form of crop residue and low
quality crop, which is directly useless to humans. However, cattle (ruminants)
convert these into high quality meat and milk. In addition to this, our cattle
also utilize grasses on fallow lands, non arable poor quality lands, open ranges and fadama in the same manner. Cattle however have to move to these locations to
access these opportunities. To further facilitate this movement, Governments
over the years developed grazing reserves and demarcated interconnecting stock
routes that have been in existence for very longtime.
For access to crop residue on farm, pastoralists
usually negotiate with farmers. If, however any conflict arose from this
arrangement including from encroachment of farms into stock routes, these are
usually amicably resolved, with the pastoralist sometimes even paying fines.
The frequency and level of current “self help” to justice by killing cattle,
attacking herders or herders attacking farmers is unusual. It has almost
destroyed the harmonious socio-economic equilibrium of the mixed farming
system.
Interestingly even in UK today some form of
transhumance pastoralism exists. Transhumance sheep in UK are transported in
trucks between rough grazing on highland areas and lowlands for grazing.
Another example is in wealthier countries such as Oman and Saudi Arabia where
State provide vehicles at subsidized rates to pastoralists to assist with
animal transportation between grazing lands. In USA there are still winter and
summer ranges.
Let me further
illustrate the economics of pastoralism. UK has 9.7 million cattle, in 2014, UK imported livestock feeds worth £899 million (Naira; 249.5b) to maintain its beef and milk industry.
Today a kilo of beef in UK costs between £10-44 (Naira; 2,775-12,210). This
livestock feeds import figure exposes the fallacy that UK cattle are raised on
grass produced on UK farms. What casual observers fail to notice is the
existence of silos that mainly contain imported feeds in many farms. Grass
produced on farms is never sufficient but always need to be supplemented with
feed concentrates. British cattle survive on Argentinean feeds.
One of the indices for economic development of a
country is measured on the amount of meat consumption per person. Therefore, as
our economy improves so will the demand for more cheap meat and milk by all
including those calling for the heads of pastoralist today.
Another paradox is this. Historically pastoralists
even in pre-colonial Africa are known to be generally law abiding. They paid
cattle tax and any other legitimate State tax, for right of passage and also to
secure State protection. Understandingly, a person with a big mobile capital
(cattle) sometimes accompanied by family, will pay any amount for protection
against bandits. He is also unlikely to invite unnecessary trouble. However,
globally pastoralists are reputed not to be easy targets, not just because they
are mobile. They have what Sociologists call “culture of honour”. When threatened
or attacked, they will fight to protect their honour, family and assets. And
when they fight, they fight hard because they can lose everything and also need
to make the point that they are no weaklings or ease preys.
Cattle ownership in Nigeria is changing. Thanks to successful
control of major livestock killer diseases. Today investment in livestock
brings significant high returns. In Nigeria over time pastoralists have settled
as agro-pastoralists living peacefully with their neighbours in many if not all
the States of the Federation. In fact, some of the cattle they herd belong to
their indigenous neighbours. This is the
future and Government should encourage this trend by;
Ø Providing incentives for settling as
agro-pastoralist and establishment of cattle farms.
(e.g.Bank of Agriculture to create special loan schemes)
Ø Urgently
addressing some issues of climate changes depleting range land(Great Green Wall
project, rehabilitation of rangeland etc).
Ø Tackling
cattle rustling,(majority of cattle theft is practised by urbanised individuals
linked to the market system), rural banditry and prosecuting persons
responsible for current killings.
Ø Introducing
cattle identifications for registration, traceability and movements monitoring.
Ø Funding
research on breeds improvement, feeding regimes etc and introducing degree
courses in range science (non available in country) to address the dearth of
trained personnel in range management.
Ø Introducing
of Silvo pastoralism (cattle production in tree plantations –similar to agro-forestry)
in the Southern States.
Ø Mounting
advocacy on the positive contributions of pastoralists and censuring hate
speeches.
Finally, your submission on hydroponic is interesting but I have
reservations about it. Hydroponic is for application in intensive, small -
scale livestock situation with very high outputs, in my opinion, range land
remains the best cow/calf production system in sub-Sahara Africa.
Dr. Junaidu A. Maina, junaidumaina@gmail.com
Dear Dr. Othman
Thanks for your interesting article on
Hydroponics, the conflicts between Fulani and farmers are common in Africa. The
fulani people are like our Maasai in Kenya. As long as they think there's
enough land for them to graze, there will always be conflicts. Kenyan
Government is working hard to address these conflicts. Recently, the Kenyan
Ministry of Agriculture has mobilised some extension services in
Maasai communities where conflicts and
introduced farming to them with a business aim. We have communities like
Turkana, Samburu and Pokot which are largely nomads and like to move with
animals from one village to another. They always fight due to intrusion of one
community to another's pasture land. There's also cattle rustling. To curb
these heinous acts, the government is subsidizing these communities and urging
them to wake up from their sleep. To start thinking of zero grazing, to farm
high value crops and also impart business skills. The media has also been urged
to celebrate and air such converted nomads who have now decided to settle and
farm in an efficient way that does not entail conflicts. And as land in Kenya
decreases, most nomads are now left with no option but to adapt. Nomadic way of
livestock production has to change and in fact changing in Kenya, otherwise the
nomads will remain chained to their lifestyle with insignificant profits and
low productivity. The herders also produce
dry matter such as hay through farming and selling the surplus.
Regards,
Samuel Mbugua, grandeurafrica@gmail.com